“the Tribunal considers that Mr Whaley’s evidence provides an adequate assessment of the productivity loss suffered by the Claimant and thus does not warrant any further adjustments. Accordingly, the Tribunal declines to make any adjustment to the figure….accepted above.”

“…I prefer the somewhat more pragmatic approach of Alan Whaley…”

“Alan Whaley is a “leader in the field”, widely regarded by peers and clients alike as an “absolutely exceptional expert” in the international construction market”.

“I therefore accept Mr Whaley’s analysis of the culpability for the delay. First because I accept his analysis of the critical path and secondly having considered important matters of difference, as between Mr Whaley and Mr [X] as set out above.”